A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-August/027946.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python build trouble with the new gcc/binutils

[Python-Dev] Python build trouble with the new gcc/binutilsAndrew Koenig ark@research.att.com
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:34:05 -0400 (EDT)
Zack> On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 12:38:24PM -0400, Andrew Koenig wrote:

>> #0  __register_frame_info_bases (begin=0xfed50000, ob=0xfed50000, tbase=0x0, 
>> dbase=0x0) at /tmp/build1165/gcc-3.1.1/gcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:83

Zack> Er, is the directory name misleading, or have you picked up
Zack> libgcc_s.so from 3.1.1?  In theory that shouldn't be a problem; in
Zack> practice it could well be the problem.

This particular test was done with gcc 3.1.1 and binutils 2.13.

As I said at the beginning of the discussion, if I use gcc 3.1.1
and binutils 2.12.1, the Python install works.  If I use gcc 3.2
*or* binutils 2.13, the Python install fails.




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4