>>>>> "WD" =3D=3D Walter D=F6rwald <walter@livinglogic.de> writes:
WD> Martin v. Loewis and I were discussing whether it would make
WD> sense to make the helper method add_type (which is used for
WD> adding a mapping between one type and one extension) visible
WD> on the module level.
WD> Any comments?
+1 on add_types() being public, but it should probably have a strict
flag to decide whether to add the new entry to the standard types dict
or the common types dict.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4