> > How about the following counterproposal. This also changes some of > > the other format codes to be a little more regular. > > > > Code C type Range check > > > > b unsigned char 0..UCHAR_MAX > > B unsigned char none ** > > h unsigned short 0..USHRT_MAX > > H unsigned short none ** > > i int INT_MIN..INT_MAX > > I * unsigned int 0..UINT_MAX > > l long LONG_MIN..LONG_MAX > > k * unsigned long none > > L long long LLONG_MIN..LLONG_MAX > > K * unsigned long long none > > > > Notes: > > > > * New format codes. > > > > ** Changed from previous "range-and-a-half" to "none"; the > > range-and-a-half checking wasn't particularly useful. > > Fine with me. OK, I've added this to my TODO list (python.org/sf/595026, assigned to me -- but if someone else wants to do it, please assign to yourself or submit a patch and leave a note in the bug item!). --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4