Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com> writes: > If we have only pure signed and pure unsigned converters it would mean > an extraordinary amount of work, but luckily it seems that that is not > going to happen. Now I'm confused: "l" *is* a "pure signed converter", no? I.e. it won't accept a value above 2**31-1, right? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4