"M.-A. Lemburg" <mal@lemburg.com>: > I wonder why the implementation warns about 0xff << 24... 0xff000000 > fits nicely into a 32-bit integer. I don't see why the "changing sign" > is relevant here When the change happens, the result will be a positive number instead of a negative one. While this isn't relevant for what you're doing, it might be relevant in some other applications, so I suppose it was thought prudent to warn about it. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4