Martin v. Loewis wrote: > Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes: > > >>Is it worth it? > > > If you believe that the problem is real, yes. I think that the tuple is not the problem here, it's the fact that so many objects are recorded in the memo to later rebuild recursive structures. Now, I believe that recursive structures in pickles are not very common, so the memo is mostly useless in these cases. Perhaps pickle could grow an option to assume that a data structure is non-recursive ?! In that case, no data would be written to the memo (or only the id() mapped to 1 to double-check). -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH _______________________________________________________________________ eGenix.com -- Makers of the Python mx Extensions: mxDateTime,mxODBC,... Python Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4