Martin v. Loewis wrote: > pickle currently puts tuples into the memo on pickling, but only ever > uses the position field ([0]), never the object itself ([1]). > > I understand that the reference to the object is needed to keep it > alive while pickling. > > Unfortunately, this means one needs to allocate 36 bytes for the > tuple. > > I think this memory consumption could be reduced by saving the objects > in a list, and only saving the position in the memo dictionary. That > would save roughly 32 bytes per memoized object, assuming there is no > malloc overhead. While that may save you some bytes, wouldn't it break pickle subclasses using the memo as well ? -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH _______________________________________________________________________ eGenix.com -- Makers of the Python mx Extensions: mxDateTime,mxODBC,... Python Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4