Neil Schemenauer wrote: > Tim Peters wrote: > > IOW, do we follow find() rigidly, or retain "str1 in str2"'s current > > behavior when str1 is empty? > > I vote for the former. D'oh. I meant the LATER (e.g. raise an error for an empty LHS). Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4