[Michael Hudson] > It's about 5%: > > $ ../../build/python pystone.py > Pystone(1.1) time for 100000 passes = 8.11 > This machine benchmarks at 12330.5 pystones/second > $ ../../build/python pystone.py > Pystone(1.1) time for 100000 passes = 7.69 > This machine benchmarks at 13003.9 pystones/second If I didn't know better, I'd think you ran the same python twice there. > I can run the vanilla pystone whilst compiling or something if you > like :) That's OK, the speedup will be larger on Windows. I can guarantee that, since I'll be doing the Windows timings <wink>. > ... > It's the old boys club effect: I worked damn hard to get to the point > of understanding this stuff, so everyone else should bloody well have > to too! > ... > All I can say is that I'd been driven insane by co_lnotab and > Python/compile.c when I wrote that comment <wink>. I understand. It was insanity that drove me to write the co_lnotab comments that tempted you into believing it was possible to do something rational with it, and I apologize for that <wink>. I like the new comments! Thank you.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4