Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > My point was that since zip()'s output seems to be[*] used mostly in > for-loop contexts, the incompatibility is mostly theoretical. The very first example I found of zip() in my own code does a sort() on the result, in a Schwarzian-transform-like sort method. It's pretty useful that way, so I doubt my own code is unique with this usage. I totally agree that zip() should have been an iterator, the same could be said of range()... It's simply too late. Just
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4