> What do you guys think about the merits of an iterzip() function that > behaves like zip() but returns an iterator instead of a list? Hm, I'm not particularly enamored of the idea of adding 'iter' versions of everything under the sun. I wish zip() could've been an interator from the start, but now that it isn't, I don't think it's such a big deal. (An iterator version is easily written as a generator.) In general I'm not keen on increasing the number of builtin functions much. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4