[Guido van Rossum]
>
> Nothing would change. None would be a literal keyword, but its value
> in an expression would be the same as before, so None.__class__ would
> work. Compare "foo".__class__.
>>> ''.__class__
<type 'str'>
>>> [].__class__
<type 'list'>
>>> {}.__class__
<type 'dict'>
>>> True.__class__
<type 'int'>
>>> 2.__class__
File "<input>", line 1
2.__class__
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>> 2.2.__class__
<type 'float'>
>>> 2L.__class__
<type 'long'>
>>>
Looks like int is one of the few literals that doesn't allow this. But
floats and longs do. Hmmm. Just FYI. ;-)
---
Patrick K. O'Brien
Orbtech
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4