> > The devel-docs tell me about METH_CLASS: > > > > The method will be passed the type object as the first parameter > > rather than an instance of the type. This is used to create class > > methods, similar to what is created when using the classmethod() > > built-in function. New in version 2.3. > > > > 1. This seems wrong. The first parameter the function receives > > is NULL, the type object goes together with the remaining arguments > > in the second parameter (which is a tuple). > > > > Is the documentation wrong, or is the code wrong (I didn't find > > any use of METH_CLASS in the CVS sources)? > > I'll leave this for Fred to answer, since he implemented this. If there is still a choice, I would prefer that the docs are correct, and the code should be fixed. This would allow to use, for example, METH_O in the usual way: a function which receives one parameter (in addition to the type object passed implicitely). Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4