Alex Martelli wrote: > Apart from this, "indices" suggests you're getting ONLY indices -- > while when you iterate on this type you get indices AND contents. Ah, I misunderstood what this unnamed function does. I was thinking it works like .keys() on dictionaries. You're telling me it works like .items(). In that case I don't like enumerate() or itemize(). :-( Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4