----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Martelli" <aleax@aleax.it> > > The new type is a numerator but that is a mouthful so the built-in function > > should be named numer(), just like iter() is short for iterator. If people > > Nice. I doubt it will fly, but among the alternatives mentioned so far it > gets my vote. Blick. Abbrevs suck. Plus I don't want to re-use the sucky name enum for something related to what 'C' and C++ use it for. +1 for itemize +0.8 for enumerate (in other contexts/languages/systems it just returns the items in sequence like a python iterator does). OK, so round it up to 1 if fractions are illegal. -Dave
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4