> There's one nagging issue that I'd like to revisit. I think I still
> like the name itemize() better than enumerate(), even though itemize()
> reminds some people of items(). Somehow that doesn't strike me as a
> strong argument: the words look pretty different to me. I like
> itemize() better because (a) it's shorter, and (b) the LaTeX command
> "\itemize" can produce numbered lists (it can also produce bulleted
> lists). I'm ready to open this one for a vote. :-)
+1 on enumerate().
I must confess I didn't understand the idea just looking at
that function's name. But once I've read the intention, I found
the function name perfect for the job.
Btw, your second argument seems to strike against you. AFAIK,
\begin{itemize} on LaTeX creates bulleted lists. To create enumerated
lists you must use \begin{enumerate}. ;-)
--
Gustavo Niemeyer
[ 2AAC 7928 0FBF 0299 5EB5 60E2 2253 B29A 6664 3A0C ]
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4