--- Alex Martelli <aleax@aleax.it> wrote:
> ...
> > There doesn't seem to be any single English word that
> > captures all of what we mean without ambiguity.
>
> Not a single VERB -- adjective "numbered" might do. Unfortunately
> [...]
If there is no really good name, how about just adopting a new simple,
short, word like "each", and letting it become the idiom?
for i, v in each(L):
print i, v
It worked for "zip" right?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4