> On Sat, Apr 13, 2002, Tim Peters wrote: [A lament on doing a patch on two brances] [Aahz] > Yup, this is precisely why I never considered trying to do serious dev > work on Windows. I think this kind of thing is much more amenable to > automation on Unixes, but I also think the NT-class OSes do better, too. > Have you considered switching to Win2K for your dev work and just testing > under Win98? To what extent do you think you could automate things using > Python and WSH? What about using multiple dekstops to keep projects > straight? Tim has both Win2K vs. Win98, and it makes little difference; he's got the same environment on both. I've seen him work. IMO, the debugger (VC++) and editor (not VC) he uses are much better than anything I've seen on Unix -- but the tools he has to use to interact with CVS are much worse. (He'll probably deny this, so I'll stop. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4