Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-April/023198.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding Optik to 2.3 standard library

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding Optik to 2.3 standard library
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding Optik to 2.3 standard library
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    SM> How about "optionparser" or "optionlib"?

    BAW> I really think we should expose Optik's main parser class through
    BAW> getopt, which we'd make into a package.  I didn't see any response
    BAW> to my previous suggestion, does everybody else hate it? ;)

I assume this can be done without changing the apparent interface to the
getopt class?  That is, if I import getopt will getopt.getopt still
reference what getopt.getopt does today?

Skip

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding Optik to 2.3 standard library
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding Optik to 2.3 standard library
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4