On donderdag, april 11, 2002, at 10:01 , Fredrik Lundh wrote: > so +1 on checking it in as it stands, but -0 on not touching > the result until 2.3 final... I'm +1 on reading the second half of that sentence as a statement that you volunteer to do this:-) (Though I still don't understand why you think a separate constructor is somehow cleaner than a new mode flag, even after reading your rationale. But I have enough other interesting things to do so I don't want to argue this point with you, you can have it if you do the work:-) -- - Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com> http://www.cwi.nl/~jack - - If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman -
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4