> I don't want to argue. Why not have both whrandom and random > around ? The prime reasons against are clutter and confusion. whrandom serves no non-redundant purpose, and the existence of both confuses both oldtimers and newcomers (I get the questions about these; I'm tired of answering them). > I don't see the value of deprecating a stone-old module > just because there's a new flashy module with a different > name around. random.py was introduced in March of 1994; the continued existence of the redundant whrandom.py has been confusing people for more than 8 years now.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4