> Perforce, Bitkeeper and Subversion are all "better-breed-CVS" solutions, > while I consider arch to be a "better-breed-revision-control-system". You may be right about Perforce or Subversion (though I doubt it), but the arch blurb I found sounds very similar to Bitkeeper. > Unfortunately it currently doesn't have an import mechanism that will keep > all your CVS history, so I understand that it is not an option at this > time. > > However, it is a young project, having its first alpha release on Jan 16 > of this year. At the current development pace, we may see the CVS import > functionality very soon. I have sent a question about this to Tom Lord. I don't think the Python developer community ought to be early adopters for a revision control system. We'll see how arch does in a few years. (BTW, arch is a lousy name. It's impossible to find using Google.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4