> Seems to me that for dev releases, there's no need for a "Windows > installer". A zip file that contains the necessary install tree ought > to be sufficient. The Windows install tree is a radical rearrangement of the Windows build tree: building an installer and running it is the fastest way to build an install tree. Building a zip file on top of that would actually take more time (BTW, the Windows installer .exe *is* a kind of standard zip file: you can open it directly with WinZip and browse its contents).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4