On Tue, Apr 09, 2002, Skip Montanaro wrote: > > >> If churning out a binary installer *suitable for a development > >> branch* can be reduced to a few minutes, fine. If not ... > > aahz> Seems to me that for dev releases, there's no need for a "Windows > aahz> installer". A zip file that contains the necessary install tree > aahz> ought to be sufficient. > > I think the contention was implicitly that many people who might be able to > help test development releases couldn't because they lack the necessary > tools to build from source. Sorry, I guess I'm still too Windows-centric in assuming that "install tree" would be generally understood as containing executables. -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "There are times when effort is important and necessary, but this should not be taken as any kind of moral imperative." --jdecker
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4