On Tue, Apr 09, 2002, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Aahz: >> >> From my POV, the fact that the BDFL follows the same PEP process >> as everyone else is a powerful point in favor of stability. > > Even if in practice it causes the peasants to show up at the gates > armed with pitchforks? Perhaps, but let's see if we can dissuade the peasants first. >> There may not be a way to do it, but I'd sure like to try some >> things to lessen the difficulty of using c.l.py. > > I'd be happy to run my PEPs by the Aahz PR machine. You might want to > remind me of that next time I float a PEP in python-dev, i.e. well > before it hits c.l.py. Added to my Todo list. ;-0) -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "There are times when effort is important and necessary, but this should not be taken as any kind of moral imperative." --jdecker
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4