[me] > > Maybe my mistake was thinking that adding bool was a small change. [Gustavo] > I think sometimes you're excessively careful when publishing PEPs. :-) > When I first read your post about PEP 285, and read you asking if > this should be implemented at all, I knew this would happen. This > makes people which have no idea what they're talking about feel like > they can influence something. Have a look at the ACCEPTED thread, > and compare it to the first thread. In the second thread, you were > decided to implement it. I'm not saying you shouldn't care about > anyone's opinion, I just think you should publish PEPs as accepted, > even if for some good reason, you fallback your idea (that's what > really happens, anyway). Good idea. Though given the history, I don't think the outrage will be any worse next time. Some people just like to rally against "dictators". :-( --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4