> From what I've seen, much of the controversy revolves around what > might be described as infelicitous phrasing. Discussion on > python-dev tends to focus on the actual issues, but that changes > once a PEP goes "into the wild". Perhaps right before you wish to > release a PEP to c.l.py, you should ask for an editing run > specifically to focus on the political side. > > This will not avoid the mud from certain quarters, of course, but > they probably should be ignored. I very much doubt it. If the language is too slick, we'll get complaints about a "marketing PEP" (see PEP 287's fate). --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4