> I'm neutral on the odd/even distinction -- all it has for it is that a > number of people are used to it from Linux. But SOMEthing more > remarkable that "up to 2.3.N experimental, 2.3.(N+1) and on > stable" is needed -- a different name, a different major release, > whatever. If we can come up with something better than parity > of minor release number, I'll personally cheer... I just can't think > of anything better right now. Comparison of microrelease with > some arbitrary threshold changing by minor.major is worse, though -- > not a clear signal at all. We could jump the micro release number to 100. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4