A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-April/022586.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: Stability and change

[Python-Dev] Re: Stability and changeAnthony Baxter Anthony Baxter <anthony@interlink.com.au>
Tue, 09 Apr 2002 01:28:44 +1000
> I only postulated that because people seem to have been calling "2.1.x"
> the Garth branch.  I don't really care one way or the other, and having the
> same even-odd meaning as the Linux kernel means you won't fight the tide of
> people who already know that way of doing things.

That tide's only the linux users, and the linux users who care what 
kernel they're running. I'm an ex-sysadmin, pretty solid unix geek, 
and I nowadays run whatever my distro comes with - as long as it 
supports what I want to do, I don't care. I don't think that saying 
"it's what linux does" is enough to carry the day by itself. I suspect 
that if you want to go with the flow, we should follow the approach that 
Microsoft uses to mark their unstable releases. (And I'm _not_ going to 
use any one of the many, many cheap shots about unstable MS releases 
that I have in my head here - feel free to substitute your own. :)

> Once checked in and tested, Guido
> should have been able to say, "okay, time for a point release", after which
> a "few buttons get pushed" (hand wave, hand wave) and a new release appears
> on SF.

Hm. Maybe. It would be nice, but the other thing to consider it that
particularly for a "Garth" branch (does that mean the experimental 
branch gets calle Wayne, I wonder?) you want to try to build it on
a couple of boxes first - just in case.

> That wasn't what I was referring to.  I was referring to the spate of
> checkins where people have to advance version numbers prior to a release.  I
> would hope that could be automated.

That's pretty much down to 
  Include/patchlevel.h - two spots
  README - one line
  Misc/NEWS - if it's been kept up to date, no changes.

> Obviously, if what I have in mind is going to work, PEP 102 is going to have
> to be streamlined quite a bit.  

No complaints from me :)

>     >> I don't know what's involved in making a Windows installer, but
>     >> somebody besides Tim should be able to do that too.
>     Anthony> I assume nothing. 
> The fact that Tim owns that process and nobody else seems willing to pick it
> up suggests otherwise.

I should be clearer - I seem to recall during 2.1.2 that Tim muttered 
something about 'half a day' to do the release. He also muttered something
about 'damn bass players' too, though, so I'm not sure how realistic he
was being there...

Anthony





RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4