barry wrote:
> I'm curious why setting an attribute isn't a name binding operation?
> Are you binding the object to the attribute name in the object's
> attribute namespace? Since that maps to a setting in an __dict__
> (usually), what /would/ you call it?
syntactic sugar?
A = 1 binds 1 to the name "A"
A.B = 1 calls A.__setattr__("B", 1)
A["B"] = 1 calls A.__setitem__("B", 1)
it's pretty clear that the first form differs from the others,
but what's the difference between the second and the third
form? or are all three name binding operations?
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4