Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-April/022381.html below:

[Python-Dev] Pymalloc and backward compatibility

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Pymalloc and backward compatibility
• Next message: [Python-Dev] ANN: Pyrex - a language for writing Python extension modules
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> As I posted a few days ago, I think it would be a good idea if someone
> (maybe me) wrote a header file that extension authors could bundle
> with their extensions that would let them program to 2.3 memory APIs
> and remain compatible all the way back to 1.5.2 (maybe further, if
> that's easy).
> 
> Assuming I get this right, does this sound like a good solution?

Yes!

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Pymalloc and backward compatibility
• Next message: [Python-Dev] ANN: Pyrex - a language for writing Python extension modules
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4