Some humanity (which I appreciate) instead of a marketing-machine [Goodger on doc-sig] <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/doc-sig/2002-March/002520.html> >This is a classic chicken-and-egg situation. Without tools, we can't >get acceptance, but in this case producing the tools is such a big job >that some form of acceptance up front is needed to keep up enthusiasm >(mine, if nobody else's). One reason for putting this PEP out there >now, is that I'm at a point where I've put a lot of work into this >project, and it's starting to pay off, but I need some reassurance to >keep me going. I want to know that I'm on the right track, that I'm >not wasting my time, and getting this PEP accepted would go a long way >in that direction. > >Even if this PEP is rejected, that will be useful information. If >accepted, then I can forget about supporting multiple markup parsers >in Docutils, at least for now. If rejected, support for multiple >parsers may be its saving grace. now-I-can-better-relate-with-the-guy,-sincerely y'rs, Samuele Pedroni.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4