Interesting how the posts seem to be actually picking up. :-) One concern about testing for "== True" is that it might push newbies into using "is True" instead. Generally, "is True" is even more dangerous than "== True" unless you're testing to see if it's a boolean at all (in which case there should be a test for "is False"), or doing something rather esoteric. -Jerry -O Gerald S. Williams, 55A-134A-E : mailto:gsw@agere.com O- -O AGERE SYSTEMS, 6755 SNOWDRIFT RD : office:610-712-8661 O- -O ALLENTOWN, PA, USA 18106-9353 : mobile:908-672-7592 O-
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4