[Michael Hudson] >>> We should probably provide an example of preprocessor hackery that >>> lets you use these interfaces and remain backward compatible as far as >>> possible. Maybe even a little .h file which we can suggest extension >>> authors bundle with their extensions. [Tim] >> I would be delighted if somebody else did that. As I age, I find it >> increasingly difficult to do more than 103 things at once <wink>. [Michael] > I hope you don't mind if I wait a few weeks. Though I guess I > wouldn't be aiming for a moving target now, I'll feel safer in a month > or so... I'd wait too, if I were you -- the only thing we've actually finished so far are the hard parts <wink>. I hope /F and MAL will help too, since they know more about writing Python extensions in real life than anyone except the Queen Mum. and-now-that-she's-dead-she-probably-knows-everything-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4