>> No. That would break backwards compatibility. False==0, and True==1; >> everything else follows from that. (But False is not 0, and True is >> not 1!) Ping> This is a strange distinction to make -- one that is not made in Ping> any other programming language i have ever encountered. I would be very surprised if none of the Lisp family of languages has similar anomalies in the relationship between eq and equal. -- Andrew Koenig, ark@research.att.com, http://www.research.att.com/info/ark
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4