----- Original Message ----- From: "Ka-Ping Yee" <ping@lfw.org> > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > No. That would break backwards compatibility. False==0, and True==1; > > everything else follows from that. (But False is not 0, and True is > > not 1!) > > This is a strange distinction to make -- one that is not made in any > other programming language i have ever encountered. Of course *i* get > it and *you* get it -- but it will be so hard to teach this particular > weirdness that i consider it fatal to the proposal. C++ is /exactly/ like that. I think also C99, but don't quote me.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4