Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-April/022227.html below:

Suggested memory API rules for 2.3

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Suggested memory API rules for 2.3
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Suggested memory API rules for 2.3
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Tim Peters wrote:
> That still needs to be done for PyObject_GC_xyz.  "Shall not mix", "shall
> hold the GIL", "guaranteed binary compatibility",

Yes.

> "shall not use in contexts requiring function designators" 

People need some form of GC free to initialize tp_free.  Extensions
can't really use _PyObject_GC_Del, can they?

  Neil

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Suggested memory API rules for 2.3
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Suggested memory API rules for 2.3
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4