I spoke too soon: > Does a lack of responses mean that there *are* no issues? > > I came here for a good argument! And I got one, on comp.lang.python, flamebait and all. BTW, Barry Warsaw wrote this comment for CVS revision 1.7 of python/nondist/peps/pep-0009.txt: "In David Goodger's PEP 287, he has a better Emacs turd section." I hope a new revision gets checked in soon. I don't want to be Google-associated with "a better Emacs turd". Drat, that's done it. Now my fate is sealed. -- David Goodger goodger@users.sourceforge.net Open-source projects: - Python Docstring Processing System: http://docstring.sourceforge.net - reStructuredText: http://structuredtext.sourceforge.net - The Go Tools Project: http://gotools.sourceforge.net
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4