> [RDH] > > > Executive Summary: > > > 1. iterindexed(collection) --> accepted > [GvR] > > Except I want to think more about the name. > > Okay, here's what we have so far: > > iterindexed()-- five syllables is a mouthfull > index() -- nice verb but could be confused the .index() method > indexed() -- widely liked however adjectives should be avoided > count() -- direct and explicit but often used in other contexts > itercount() -- direct, explicit and hated by more than one person > enumerate() -- a contender but doesn't mention iteration or indices > iteritems() -- already used by dictionaries for key:value pairs [David Ascher] > My current fave is 'indexer'. Something which creates an index. I like it! Raymond, what do you think? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4