A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-September/017364.html below:

[Python-Dev] Check-in process

[Python-Dev] Check-in process [Python-Dev] Check-in processKa-Ping Yee ping@lfw.org
Sun, 2 Sep 2001 03:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
> As for process issues...I agree that we need better procedures and criteria
> for what goes into the library.

For a start, my current understanding is:

    - Adding a module to the standard library is a big change.
    - Modifying a core type or the interpreter loop is a big change.
    - Breaking compatibility is a big change.
    - Any big change requires confirmation specifically from Guido.

I was pretty surprised to see compilerlike.py go in.  Even if i had
seen +1s from everyone else on python-dev, i still wouldn't have
been comfortable checking it in without hearing from the BDFL.


-- ?!ng




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4