[python.net mail unblocks again, sigh] Armin Rigo <arigo@ulb.ac.be> writes: > Hello everybody, > > > 2X on pystone is nothing to snort at -- it's good! > > Thanks, but I believe that much better results can be > obtained. However, I have a problem here. I am starting to run out > of free time for Psyco. Shame! > I would like to put efforts in helping people understand how Psyco > works, so that it can be developped up to a really usable state -- > it is currently more of a proof-of-concept, but it would be just too > bad to loose this opportunity, I guess. Besides, I believe that with > some more work we could really turn the current version into > something great. I've been meaning to take a good look at pysco since you first announced it, but have never found the time/inspiration needed. It would be a shame if it were to die. > That's just too much for me alone now (I should be doing a math > Ph.D. these days you know ;-). Same here! ...googles... logic, eh? Nutter <wink>. Out of curiosity, do you know people at vub? I was at a conference with Michel van den Bergh and Tor Lowen in September... (small world). > So my request is, Does anyone feel like investing some time in Psyco > just on the basis of the current preliminary results ? Shall I > write a technical in-depth overview ? I you can find the time to write it, I'll do my best to find the time to read it properly. What else is the first year of a PhD for? Cheers, M. -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. -- Jamie Zawinski
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4