On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:58:07 +0100 (MET) Armin Rigo <arigo@ulb.ac.be> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > > 2X on pystone is nothing to snort at -- it's good! > > Thanks, but I believe that much better results can be obtained. However, I > have a problem here. I am starting to run out of free time for Psyco. > > I would like to put efforts in helping people understand how Psyco works, > so that it can be developped up to a really usable state -- it is > currently more of a proof-of-concept, but it would be just too bad to > loose this opportunity, I guess. Besides, I believe that with some more > work we could really turn the current version into something great. That's > just too much for me alone now (I should be doing a math Ph.D. these days > you know ;-). So my request is, Does anyone feel like investing some time > in Psyco just on the basis of the current preliminary results ? Shall I > write a technical in-depth overview ? off course, it will always be worthwile although I am not the one to take the responsibility of dragging it along (lack of time/experience/guts/whatever) I will be very happy to see it in usable state ;-) regards -- Marek Pêtlicki <marpet@linuxpl.org> Linux User ID=162988
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4