>>>>> "SM" == Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> writes:
SM> No, I was just trying to mimic the structure of the
SM> test_xmlrpc.py module. It put all the cases into one class,
SM> so I did to. I realized I wanted to run the creation test
SM> before the others and noticed that it was executing them in
SM> alphabetical order. I was just wondering if I could rely on
SM> that or if that was just a quirk of either the current
SM> test_support or unittest implementations and couldn't be
SM> relied on.
I don't think you should count on execution order. I don't think it's
guaranteed and it will make your tests much more fragile.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4