>>>>> "MM" == Michael McLay <mclay@erols.com> writes:
MM> I hope the feature freeze won't rule out the patch for 2.2.
Without BDFL override, yes, it does.
>>>>> "TP" == Tim Peters <tim.one@home.com> writes:
TP> I expect we will. Ditto __metatype__, long-winded super(),
TP> function-based property "declarations", and all the other new
TP> stuff. We're aiming for progress with the new features, not
TP> perfection <wink>.
I believe Guido knows that it will be impossible to get all this stuff
right the first time, and even the 2.2 beta cycle won't shake out all
the problems. I think his intention was to get the basic
functionality in place for Python 2.2, and to clean up and improve the
syntax and semantics in future releases.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4