Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> writes:
> Could bytecodehacks be made to do the heavy lifting for MAL's switch
> performance testing? Might be easier than manually creating code strings.
... and from the archives as python.net mail delivery is bust (grr) ...
> Nor have I, but Michael Hudson is the author. I'm sure his gears
> are already turning... ;-)
Nope. Haven't worked on bytecodehacks in about 18 months. It lost
it's appeal eventually. It doesn't even work properly with Python
2.0, let alone what's in CVS. It is surely easier to work with the
compiler package (and if it's not, I'm not sure what the point of it
is...).
It doesn't help that I don't really care about the proposed
optimization...
Cheers,
M.
--
NUTRIMAT: That drink was individually tailored to meet your
personal requirements for nutrition and pleasure.
ARTHUR: Ah. So I'm a masochist on a diet am I?
-- The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, Episode 9
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4