"Tim Peters" <tim.one@home.com> writes:
> I'm calling this one a bug in doctest.py, and will fix it there. Ugly:
> since we can longer rely on list.sort() not raising exceptions, it won't be
> enough to replace the existing
>
> for k, v in dict.items():
>
> with
>
> items = dict.items()
> items.sort()
> for k, v in items:
Hmm, reading through these posts for summary purposes, it occurs to me
that this *is* safe, 'cause item 0 of the tuples will always be
distinct strings, and as equal-length tuples are compared
lexicographically, the values will never actually be compared!
pointless-ly y'rs
M.
--
93. When someone says "I want a programming language in which I
need only say what I wish done," give him a lollipop.
-- Alan Perlis, http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4