> This one Aahz singled out previously as a canonical example of a patch he > would *not* include, because adding new attributes seemed potentially > disruptive to him (but why? maybe someone was depending on the precise value > of len(dir(xrange(42)))?). There is a patch on SF which backports that change without introducing these attributes in the 2.0.1 class. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4