On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:34:13 -0500, Guido van Rossum <guido@digicool.com> wrote:
> I haven't seen *any* complaints about this, so is it possible that
> they don't mind having the $Revision: ... $ strings in there?
I don't know.
Like I said, my feelings about that are not very strong...
> > I think it should be possible to build the Windows version from the .tgz
> > and that is what (IMHO) should happen, instead of Tim and Guido exporting
> > from the CVS independantly. This would stop problems like the one
> > Tim and I had this (my time) morning.
>
> Who are you telling us how to work?
I said "I think" and "IMHO", so I'm covered. I was only giving suggestions.
You're free to ignore them if you think my opinion is without merit.
I happen to think otherwise <8am wink>, but you're the BDFL and I'm not.
Are you saying it's not important to you that the .py's in Windows and
UNIX are the same?
I think it should be a priority, given that when people complain about
OS-independant problems, they often neglect to mention the OS.
--
"I'll be ex-DPL soon anyway so I'm |LUKE: Is Perl better than Python?
looking for someplace else to grab power."|YODA: No...no... no. Quicker,
-- Wichert Akkerman (on debian-private)| easier, more seductive.
For public key, finger moshez@debian.org |http://www.{python,debian,gnu}.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4