Neil Schemenauer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 06:25:43PM +0100, Christian Tismer wrote:
> > I believe this is going to be the best possible efficient
> > implementation of generators. And I'm very confident that it
> > will make it into the core with ease and without the need for a
> > PEP.
>
> I sure hope not. We need to come up with better APIs and a
> better interface from Python code. The current interface is not
> efficiently implementable in Jython, AFAIK. We also need to
> figure out how to make things play nicely with stackless. IMHO,
> a PEP is required.
Yes, sure. What I meant was not the current code, but the
simplistic, straightforward approach.
> My plan now is to look at how stackless works as I now understand
> some of the issues. Since no stackless light patch exists
> writing one may be a good learning project. Its still a long
> road to 2.2. :-)
Warning, *unreadable* code. If you really want to read that,
make sure to use ceval_pre.c, this comes almost without optimization.
ciao - chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4