Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-March/013737.html below:

[Python-Dev] Simple generators, round 2

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Simple generators, round 2
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Simple generators, round 2
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[Neil]
> One unexpected benefit: with PyEval_EvalFrame split out of
> eval_code2 the interpreter is 5% faster on my machine.  I
> suspect the compiler has an easier time optimizing the loop in
> the smaller function.

[Christian]
> Really!? I thought you told about a speed loss?

You must be referring to an earlier post I made.  That was purely
speculation.  I didn't time things until the weekend.  Also, the
5% speedup is base on the refactoring of eval_code2 with the
added generator bits.  I wouldn't put much weight on the apparent
speedup either.  Its probably slower on other platforms.

  Neil

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Simple generators, round 2
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Simple generators, round 2
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4